Commentary for Bava Kamma 70:15
לא סיפא ניזק שמא ומזיק ברי רישא ניזק ברי ומזיק שמא
It would therefore seem that it was the plaintiff who was doubtful<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In which case the argument contained in the preceding note could no more be maintained. ');"><sup>11</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 70:15. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.